|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
OT - Vista Search and Recursive GetFilesa good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace listen to this. I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion reigns. Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file totals are correct. Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not there or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS yes. Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects reality. Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it right. Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. thanks for listening now back to the development Lloyd Sheen And your point is?
Show quoteHide quote "Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders > is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace > listen to this. > > I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and > it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process > goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. > This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. > > So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get > rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All > looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. > I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. > Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... > > Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the > search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion > reigns. > > Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. > Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the > ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the > folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old > DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file > totals are correct. > > Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I > asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not there > or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS yes. > > Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects reality. > > Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it right. > > Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. > > thanks for listening > now back to the development > > Lloyd Sheen
Show quote
Hide quote
"Stephany Young" <noone@localhost> wrote in message Not wanting to have a flame war but I will answer.news:OosYkCHMIHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > And your point is? > > > "Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message > news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders >> is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace >> listen to this. >> >> I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and >> it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process >> goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. >> This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. >> >> So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get >> rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All >> looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. >> I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. >> Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... >> >> Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the >> search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion >> reigns. >> >> Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. >> Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the >> ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the >> folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old >> DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file >> totals are correct. >> >> Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I >> asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not >> there or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS >> yes. >> >> Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects >> reality. >> >> Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it >> right. >> >> Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. >> >> thanks for listening >> now back to the development >> >> Lloyd Sheen > 1. Vista - personal preference - mine is thumbs down 2. What is a search for? To find existing items. When it doesn't what good is it. 3. Support. When support thinks that finding non-existant items is not a problem with a search engine then what can I say? LS Lloyd Sheen schreef:
> Actually your point would be to disable the indexing service.> Not wanting to have a flame war but I will answer. > > 1. Vista - personal preference - mine is thumbs down > 2. What is a search for? To find existing items. When it doesn't > what good is it. > 3. Support. When support thinks that finding non-existant items is > not a problem with a search engine then what can I say? > > LS -- Rinze van Huizen C-Services Holland b.v
Show quote
Hide quote
"C-Services Holland b.v." <cshNOSPAMPLEASE@csh4u.nl> wrote in message I have stopped the service, changed it to manual and it starts anyway. news:67ednYll7Zb1EtDanZ2dnUVZ8sninZ2d@zeelandnet.nl... > Lloyd Sheen schreef: >> >> Not wanting to have a flame war but I will answer. >> >> 1. Vista - personal preference - mine is thumbs down >> 2. What is a search for? To find existing items. When it doesn't >> what good is it. >> 3. Support. When support thinks that finding non-existant items is >> not a problem with a search engine then what can I say? >> >> LS > > Actually your point would be to disable the indexing service. > > -- > Rinze van Huizen > C-Services Holland b.v Vista has no concept that the user of a system should have some say over what happens. MS Bob was a better implementation of something nobody wanted than Vista. LS Lloyd Sheen wrote:
> "C-Services Holland b.v." wrote in message Can't you set it to disabled? Manual only means it won't start until >> Actually your point would be to disable the indexing service. > > I have stopped the service, changed it to manual and it starts anyway. something tries to use it, not necessarily the user; automatic means it starts when the computer starts. Andrew
Show quote
Hide quote
"Andrew Morton" <a**@in-press.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message That did it. The search dialog now says "Your searches might be slow news:%23w9NPznMIHA.4136@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Lloyd Sheen wrote: >> "C-Services Holland b.v." wrote in message >>> Actually your point would be to disable the indexing service. >> >> I have stopped the service, changed it to manual and it starts anyway. > > Can't you set it to disabled? Manual only means it won't start until > something tries to use it, not necessarily the user; automatic means it > starts when the computer starts. > > Andrew > ....." and give ability to turn it on. But I won't. thanks LS
Show quote
Hide quote
"Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message Back to development. The big question is: Have you backed up your news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders > is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace > listen to this. > > I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and > it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process > goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. > This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. > > So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get > rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All > looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. > I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. > Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... > > Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the > search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion > reigns. > > Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. > Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the > ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the > folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old > DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file > totals are correct. > > Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I > asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not there > or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS yes. > > Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects reality. > > Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it right. > > Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. > > thanks for listening > now back to the development > > Lloyd Sheen development files and your MP3 files? Show quoteHide quote >
Show quote
Hide quote
"Bill Yanaire" <b***@yanaire.com> wrote in message Yes, ever since the install of Vista which wiped my ITunes folder (and this news:e3dlYSHMIHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > "Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message > news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders >> is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace >> listen to this. >> >> I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and >> it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process >> goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. >> This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. >> >> So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get >> rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All >> looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. >> I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. >> Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... >> >> Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the >> search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion >> reigns. >> >> Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. >> Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the >> ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the >> folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old >> DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file >> totals are correct. >> >> Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I >> asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not >> there or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS >> yes. >> >> Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects >> reality. >> >> Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it >> right. >> >> Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. >> >> thanks for listening >> now back to the development >> >> Lloyd Sheen > > Back to development. The big question is: Have you backed up your > development files and your MP3 files? > > >> > > was at the instruction of MS Support telling me that the upgrade to Vista Ultimate would not touch any non OS partition) I have a removable HD which I use to back up. LS
Show quote
Hide quote
"Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message I've seen this same behavior in XP Pro. You would think the delete calls in news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders > is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace > listen to this. > > I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and > it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process > goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. > This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. > > So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get > rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All > looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. > I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. > Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... > > Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the > search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion > reigns. > > Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. > Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the > ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the > folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old > DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file > totals are correct. > > Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I > asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not there > or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS yes. > > Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects reality. > > Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it right. > > Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. > > thanks for listening > now back to the development > > Lloyd Sheen the API would also notify the index manager to remove the file from the indexes. Mike.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Michael D. Ober" <ober***@.alum.mit.edu.nospam> wrote in message At the minimum check to see if the file exists before presenting it as a news:13kmn7tdu0ba0ae@corp.supernews.com... > "Lloyd Sheen" <a@b.c> wrote in message > news:OjjDYQGMIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> For all those who don't think that a recursive search of files in folders >> is a good thing in the Microsoft.VisualBasic.FileIO.FileSystem namespace >> listen to this. >> >> I am reorg my mp3 collection. I have written my own catalog program and >> it has xml files to cache info from tags etc. To ensure that the process >> goes ok I went to delete all the xml files to force a rescan of the tags. >> This should be simple ..... but this is Vista. >> >> So I use search and get a list of the xml files. I shift-delete to get >> rid of them. I go to one of the folders to check on t he delete. All >> looks ok. I search again and .... the same number of files is presented. >> I shake my head and what is happening. Ok lets try the delete again. >> Guess what, the files don't exist. I kinda knew that but.... >> >> Ok after all is done, and I am checking on the files again. I redo the >> search. Now I see about twice as many xml files as I expect. Confusion >> reigns. >> >> Sort them and low and behold there are duplicates for many of the files. >> Since I had changed the folder structure not all were duplicated just the >> ones where folders were left the same. More confusion. I check the >> folders and of course there is only one file with the file name (good old >> DOS). Go to CMD window and check with an old DOS command. The file >> totals are correct. >> >> Phone MS support. Explain my problem. Oh it is the search indexer. I >> asked if a search which is correct would contain files that were not >> there or duplicates and of course the answer is yes. That would be an MS >> yes. >> >> Wrote a simple vb prog to do the search and of course it reflects >> reality. >> >> Just saw the new Apple commercial about Vista. Boy do they have it >> right. >> >> Why I "upgraded" I ask myself just about every day. >> >> thanks for listening >> now back to the development >> >> Lloyd Sheen > > I've seen this same behavior in XP Pro. You would think the delete calls > in the API would also notify the index manager to remove the file from the > indexes. > > Mike. > > "found". LS
Disecting Strings
Removing reference type members from a generic list clone vs2008 or not Fastest way to import large fixed width file into a DataTable XML Deserializer problem Multithreading Invoke Workaround Is setting Bounds Property the same as setting Size and Location? References to different versions of MS Outlook in a VB.NET application Integer array from vb to c function Convert code line to VB |
|||||||||||||||||||||||