Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About
Author
26 Jan 2006 1:02 PM
guy
Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?
i was pleasnatly surprised at how robust VS2002 was when it first appeared
but vs2005 rtm  feels more buggy than the VS2002 beta 1 (even thogh it had
case sensitive vb!)

*guy*

Author
26 Jan 2006 1:16 PM
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
"guy" <g**@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb:
> Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?


From my personal experience with VS 2005, I'd say it's more a beta 3 than an
RTM version.  Note that service pack 1 will be released in a few months.

--
M S   Herfried K. Wagner
M V P  <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B   <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>
Author
26 Jan 2006 1:31 PM
guy
ack:-)

Show quoteHide quote
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" wrote:

> "guy" <g**@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb:
> > Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?
>
>
> From my personal experience with VS 2005, I'd say it's more a beta 3 than an
> RTM version.  Note that service pack 1 will be released in a few months.
>
> --
>  M S   Herfried K. Wagner
> M V P  <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
>  V B   <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>
>
>
Author
26 Jan 2006 4:05 PM
Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
Herfried,
Its really sad when you cause the product (C++/CLI class library) to be in a
not responding state, then kill it & the window to report the problem (of
not responding) goes into a not responding state.

Of course when I attempt to create a small sample of the problem, the small
sample doesn't have an issue.

--
Hope this helps
Jay [MVP - Outlook]
..NET Application Architect, Enthusiast, & Evangelist
T.S. Bradley - http://www.tsbradley.net


Show quoteHide quote
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:%23Kwl$qnIGHA.3936@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| "guy" <g**@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb:
| > Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?
|
|
| From my personal experience with VS 2005, I'd say it's more a beta 3 than
an
| RTM version.  Note that service pack 1 will be released in a few months.
|
| --
| M S   Herfried K. Wagner
| M V P  <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
| V B   <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>
|
Author
26 Jan 2006 1:58 PM
Carlos J. Quintero [VB MVP]
Beta, CTP, RC, and RTM are just labels. You just pull the source code from
from the SCC system, test it and label it. But certainly VS 2005 was
released with less betas and RCs that VS.NET 2002/2003 did, surely to ship
it in 2005, given the name of the product...

--

Best regards,

Carlos J. Quintero

MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio
You can code, design and document much faster:
http://www.mztools.com


Show quoteHide quote
"guy" <g**@discussions.microsoft.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:FED33C5F-E5EC-4858-952C-F961D6D3ECA1@microsoft.com...
> Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?
> i was pleasnatly surprised at how robust VS2002 was when it first appeared
> but vs2005 rtm  feels more buggy than the VS2002 beta 1 (even thogh it had
> case sensitive vb!)
>
> *guy*
Author
26 Jan 2006 2:25 PM
guy
yes,
if MS shot themselves in the foot, if they had called it VS8 (or whatever)
and released it first quarter 2006 there would be many less frustrated
developers!

Show quoteHide quote
"Carlos J. Quintero [VB MVP]" wrote:

> Beta, CTP, RC, and RTM are just labels. You just pull the source code from
> from the SCC system, test it and label it. But certainly VS 2005 was
> released with less betas and RCs that VS.NET 2002/2003 did, surely to ship
> it in 2005, given the name of the product...
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carlos J. Quintero
>
> MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio
> You can code, design and document much faster:
> http://www.mztools.com
>
>
> "guy" <g**@discussions.microsoft.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:FED33C5F-E5EC-4858-952C-F961D6D3ECA1@microsoft.com...
> > Is the rtm version of studio 2005 actually the beta 3?
> > i was pleasnatly surprised at how robust VS2002 was when it first appeared
> > but vs2005 rtm  feels more buggy than the VS2002 beta 1 (even thogh it had
> > case sensitive vb!)
> >
> > *guy*
>
>
>