Can VB 2003 use .net 2.0 framework?

2 May 2006 8:27 PM

cj

2 May 2006 8:36 PM

Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]

"cj" <cj@nospam.nospam> schrieb:
> Can VB 2003 use .net 2.0 framework?

No, that's not supported.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

3 May 2006 1:13 AM

Kevin Yu [MSFT]

Hi,

The VS.NET 2003 is bound to .NET framework 1.1 and cannot use .NET
framework 2.0 instead.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support

============================================================================
==========================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
============================================================================
==========================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

3 May 2006 1:02 PM

Göran_Andersson

cj wrote:

> Can VB 2003 use .net 2.0 framework?

Visual Studio 2003 compiles to framework 1.1. The code can be run on a
computer only having framework 2.0, though.

3 May 2006 8:02 PM

Sid Price

Is this really true? My understanding is that if an application is built to
use 1.1 then it needs 1.1 installed on the target PCs.

Sid.

Show quoteHide quote

"Göran Andersson" <gu***@guffa.com> wrote in message
news:e2MYqHrbGHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> cj wrote:
>> Can VB 2003 use .net 2.0 framework?
>
> Visual Studio 2003 compiles to framework 1.1. The code can be run on a
> computer only having framework 2.0, though.

3 May 2006 8:25 PM

Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]

"Sid Price" <s**@nowhere.com> schrieb:
> Is this really true? My understanding is that if an application is built
> to use 1.1 then it needs 1.1 installed on the target PCs.

IIRC no, but testing is required because there might be some
incompatibilities between .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>