|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
How to Share Class Properties Across ProcessesI have just been asked how to share functions and properties between two
running applications. For example, I have App1 and App2 both running on the same machine. App1 uses a DLL (perhaps) that contains function SetProp(). When App1 calls it, a property in the DLL is set to "abc". App2 calls a function GetProp(), in the same DLL. GetProp() should return "abc". This sounds like a simple thing to do, but making the DLL variable shared and making both applications load the same DLL does not work. On reflection, I can see why that wouldn't (shouldn't) work, but how can it be done; preferably without having to jump through security hoops. TIA Charles Hi Charles Law,
You could use a Singleton for this: Imports System Imports System.IO Imports System.Collections Imports System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary Imports System.Runtime.Serialization ' There should be only one instance of this type per AppDomain. <Serializable()> Public NotInheritable Class Singleton Implements ISerializable ' This is the one instance of this type. Private Shared ReadOnly theOneObject As New Singleton ' Here are the instance fields. Public someString As String Public someNumber As Int32 ' Private constructor allowing this type to construct the Singleton. Private Sub New() ' Do whatever is necessary to initialize the Singleton. someString = "This is a string field" someNumber = 123 End Sub ' A method returning a reference to the Singleton. Public Shared Function GetSingleton() As Singleton Return theOneObject End Function ' A method called when serializing a Singleton. Private Sub GetObjectData(ByVal info As SerializationInfo, _ ByVal context As StreamingContext) _ Implements ISerializable.GetObjectData ' Instead of serializing this object, we will ' serialize a SingletonSerializationHelp instead. info.SetType(GetType(SingletonSerializationHelper)) ' No other values need to be added. End Sub ' Note: ISerializable's special constructor is not necessary ' because it is never called. End Class <Serializable()> Friend NotInheritable Class SingletonSerializationHelper Implements IObjectReference ' This object has no fields (although it could). ' GetRealObject is called after this object is deserialized. Public Function GetRealObject(ByVal context As StreamingContext) As Object Implements IObjectReference.GetRealObject ' When deserialiing this object, return a reference to ' the Singleton object instead. Return Singleton.GetSingleton() End Function End Class Class App <STAThread()> Shared Sub Main() Dim fs As New FileStream("DataFile.dat", FileMode.Create) Try ' Construct a BinaryFormatter and use it ' to serialize the data to the stream. Dim formatter As New BinaryFormatter ' Create an array with multiple elements refering to ' the one Singleton object. Dim a1() As Singleton = {Singleton.GetSingleton(), Singleton.GetSingleton()} ' This displays "True". Console.WriteLine("Do both array elements refer to the same object? " & _ Object.ReferenceEquals(a1(0), a1(1))) ' Serialize the array elements. formatter.Serialize(fs, a1) ' Deserialize the array elements. fs.Position = 0 Dim a2() As Singleton = DirectCast(formatter.Deserialize(fs), Singleton()) ' This displays "True". Console.WriteLine("Do both array elements refer to the same object? " & _ Object.ReferenceEquals(a2(0), a2(1))) ' This displays "True". Console.WriteLine("Do all array elements refer to the same object? " & _ Object.ReferenceEquals(a1(0), a2(0))) Catch e As SerializationException Console.WriteLine("Failed to serialize. Reason: " & e.Message) Throw Finally fs.Close() End Try End Sub End Class Show quoteHide quote "Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ecuRabPOFHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > I have just been asked how to share functions and properties between two > running applications. For example, I have App1 and App2 both running on the > same machine. App1 uses a DLL (perhaps) that contains function SetProp(). > When App1 calls it, a property in the DLL is set to "abc". App2 calls a > function GetProp(), in the same DLL. GetProp() should return "abc". > > This sounds like a simple thing to do, but making the DLL variable shared > and making both applications load the same DLL does not work. On reflection, > I can see why that wouldn't (shouldn't) work, but how can it be done; > preferably without having to jump through security hoops. > > TIA > > Charles > > Hi Pipo
Thanks for the quick response. Your example appears to operate within a single app domain, whereas I need this to operate across app domains. I have tried you example in my scenario, but when I set someString in the first application, it does not appear set in my second application. Charles Show quoteHide quote "Pipo" <P***@nobody.com> wrote in message news:O87tYgPOFHA.4052@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Hi Charles Law, > > You could use a Singleton for this: > > Imports System > Imports System.IO > Imports System.Collections > Imports System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary > Imports System.Runtime.Serialization > > > ' There should be only one instance of this type per AppDomain. > <Serializable()> Public NotInheritable Class Singleton > Implements ISerializable > > ' This is the one instance of this type. > Private Shared ReadOnly theOneObject As New Singleton > > ' Here are the instance fields. > Public someString As String > Public someNumber As Int32 > > ' Private constructor allowing this type to construct the Singleton. > Private Sub New() > ' Do whatever is necessary to initialize the Singleton. > someString = "This is a string field" > someNumber = 123 > End Sub > > ' A method returning a reference to the Singleton. > Public Shared Function GetSingleton() As Singleton > Return theOneObject > End Function > > ' A method called when serializing a Singleton. > Private Sub GetObjectData(ByVal info As SerializationInfo, _ > ByVal context As StreamingContext) _ > Implements ISerializable.GetObjectData > > ' Instead of serializing this object, we will > ' serialize a SingletonSerializationHelp instead. > info.SetType(GetType(SingletonSerializationHelper)) > ' No other values need to be added. > End Sub > > ' Note: ISerializable's special constructor is not necessary > ' because it is never called. > End Class > > > <Serializable()> Friend NotInheritable Class SingletonSerializationHelper > Implements IObjectReference > ' This object has no fields (although it could). > > ' GetRealObject is called after this object is deserialized. > Public Function GetRealObject(ByVal context As StreamingContext) As > Object Implements IObjectReference.GetRealObject > ' When deserialiing this object, return a reference to > ' the Singleton object instead. > Return Singleton.GetSingleton() > End Function > End Class > > > Class App > <STAThread()> Shared Sub Main() > Dim fs As New FileStream("DataFile.dat", FileMode.Create) > > Try > ' Construct a BinaryFormatter and use it > ' to serialize the data to the stream. > Dim formatter As New BinaryFormatter > > ' Create an array with multiple elements refering to > ' the one Singleton object. > Dim a1() As Singleton = {Singleton.GetSingleton(), > Singleton.GetSingleton()} > > ' This displays "True". > Console.WriteLine("Do both array elements refer to the same > object? > " & _ > Object.ReferenceEquals(a1(0), a1(1))) > > ' Serialize the array elements. > formatter.Serialize(fs, a1) > > ' Deserialize the array elements. > fs.Position = 0 > Dim a2() As Singleton = DirectCast(formatter.Deserialize(fs), > Singleton()) > > ' This displays "True". > Console.WriteLine("Do both array elements refer to the same > object? > " & _ > Object.ReferenceEquals(a2(0), a2(1))) > > ' This displays "True". > Console.WriteLine("Do all array elements refer to the same object? > " & _ > Object.ReferenceEquals(a1(0), a2(0))) > Catch e As SerializationException > Console.WriteLine("Failed to serialize. Reason: " & e.Message) > Throw > Finally > fs.Close() > End Try > End Sub > End Class > > > > "Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:ecuRabPOFHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >> I have just been asked how to share functions and properties between two >> running applications. For example, I have App1 and App2 both running on > the >> same machine. App1 uses a DLL (perhaps) that contains function SetProp(). >> When App1 calls it, a property in the DLL is set to "abc". App2 calls a >> function GetProp(), in the same DLL. GetProp() should return "abc". >> >> This sounds like a simple thing to do, but making the DLL variable shared >> and making both applications load the same DLL does not work. On > reflection, >> I can see why that wouldn't (shouldn't) work, but how can it be done; >> preferably without having to jump through security hoops. >> >> TIA >> >> Charles >> >> > > Hi Cor
Hmm ... I nearly mentioned remoting in my original post, but I didn't want to steer people down a particular route. I realise that this is one option, but perhaps it is a bit overkill? The principle of what I am trying to do seems quite straight forward, but maybe remoting is the sledge hammer to my nut? Just a thought. I really only need this to operate across app domains on a single machine, so security is not my main problem. Also, might remoting be a bit slow for repeated property access? Charles Show quoteHide quote "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message news:%23dVN8pPOFHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Charles, > > Are you inventing your own style of remoting? > > Cor > > > Charles,
You want a quick and dirty one. (registry) I did not write it :-) Cor Hi Cor
> You want a quick and dirty one. (registry) No, not really. In any case, the registry idea might not work if the user does not have permission to modify the registry. Charles Show quoteHide quote "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message news:OBoMx3POFHA.1476@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Charles, > > You want a quick and dirty one. (registry) > > I did not write it :-) > > Cor > Charles,
Not that it is the solution it is really quick and dirty, However why this: "does not have permission to modify the registry". For me he has that forever as long that it is his part. How many changes did you think that there have been this morning on your registry? Cor Cor
Ok, perhaps that is true, but I would prefer to use a 'built-in' .NET way rather than using the registry. Charles Show quoteHide quote "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message news:OIU5KAQOFHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Charles, > > Not that it is the solution it is really quick and dirty, > > However why this: "does not have permission to modify the registry". For > me he has that forever as long that it is his part. How many changes did > you think that there have been this morning on your registry? > > Cor > > > Am I to assume that this is not possible?
Charles Show quoteHide quote "Charles Law" <bl***@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ecuRabPOFHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >I have just been asked how to share functions and properties between two >running applications. For example, I have App1 and App2 both running on the >same machine. App1 uses a DLL (perhaps) that contains function SetProp(). >When App1 calls it, a property in the DLL is set to "abc". App2 calls a >function GetProp(), in the same DLL. GetProp() should return "abc". > > This sounds like a simple thing to do, but making the DLL variable shared > and making both applications load the same DLL does not work. On > reflection, I can see why that wouldn't (shouldn't) work, but how can it > be done; preferably without having to jump through security hoops. > > TIA > > Charles > > Charles,
> Am I to assume that this is not possible? For me it seems that you forgot that the time of static program addressing > is far behind us. (I know better). Now you need everytime to know where a program is to know its addresses and than the values in that. In addition, you lost in the sentence above "simple" :-) CorHi Cor
You are right, I mean simple, or perhaps straightforward. I'm off remoting at the moment because it seems that tcp/ip needs to be installed, and it may not be in my scenario. I'm still hoping that someone will come up with a technique that works like it used to do in the good old days. Charles Show quoteHide quote "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message news:%23I7WsZeOFHA.3808@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Charles, >> Am I to assume that this is not possible? >> > For me it seems that you forgot that the time of static program addressing > is far behind us. (I know better). > > Now you need everytime to know where a program is to know its addresses > and than the values in that. > > In addition, you lost in the sentence above "simple" > > :-) > > Cor >
delete rows from datagrid
Finalize and database connection... contradiction in msdn or a misunderstaning from my part ? no indexof-function for collection object available. General comment GUID control type Open a CSV file Deleting 100,000 rows High Speed Graphics Changing Interface or Inheritance base classes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||