The people who are still asking why they should need VB.NET, I think
should not use it. Because they actually do not need it, and, probably,
they would not use it the way it is intended to be used.
I have been programming years with vb6 and previous vers. and always
felt that language was just a toy, incapable to do any serious large
project.
Only with the advent of VB.net I felt we finally got something we
could work with.

To answer to original question, trying make a joke and a provocation,
in a language different from my native one... Frankly, I would say
that perhaps the current VB 2005 cannot be defined
fully stable... (This is forgivable considering the level
of complexity it deals with.) ... VB6 language, instead,
compared with VB.NET, was certainly *a* stable.

Hope it works :)

-t

Tommaso,

Did you ever tried the IIS class. (I thought it had that name).
Than you would never write this again. ASPNET is far much stable.

Cor

Hi Cor. I guess we hare saying the same thing. :)
So my attempt of joke did not work...
(I meant "stable" as a noun, ... hmmm never mind :) )

-t

Cor Ligthert [MVP] ha scritto:

Show quoteHide quote

Yes, your attempt at a joke *did* work! I got it!

Robin S.
-------------------------------
<tommaso.gasta***@uniroma1.it> wrote in message
Show quoteHide quote

Now I got it, sorry?

Cor

<tommaso.gasta***@uniroma1.it> schreef in bericht
Show quoteHide quote

word automation vb.net
Arranging window screens on multi-monitor Desktop
Re: Help needed in using FSO's, TextStreams, etc. --- Code Review and Advice requested
listbox's SelectedIndexChanged keep fire
Array Question, Out of Bounds
better way to program than this?
set refresh rate for an active browser window
Display Outlook Recipient Window from vb.net
sqlDataReader does not return correct sorted data
Errors when running from LAN server.