|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
.NET Securitybasic issue here so I can see the patten and better understand it with the written docs. For now, until I understand what is going on I would like to remove it to get full control of my RPC client/server framework which is already secured in its own rights and installed by corporate operators in secured computer rooms environments. I need to get the package running as always. In short, the clients, are .NET applications using our new .NET SDK class library DLL. The package can be installed on local machines, computer rooms on networks so I really need to get control of this. What I have is an exe and dll Wildcat.net.server.dll <-- our .NET SDK API DLL BSMiniRPT.exe <-- SDK example I copied these from my local D: drive to my network shared G: drive and tried to run it. I get the report below. I also tried to do what I though would remove the security from the compiled EXE and I still get the report below. What is it exactly do I need to look for to begin testing the .net work with field testers who have no restrictions where they install our server and/or run the client applications? ************** Exception Text ************** System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type 'System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission, mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed. at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet) at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand() at System.Environment.GetCommandLineArgs() at BSMiniRPT.frmMain.frmMain_Load(Object eventSender, EventArgs eventArgs) at System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) The action that failed was: Demand The type of the first permission that failed was: System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission The Zone of the assembly that failed was: Intranet ************** Loaded Assemblies ************** mscorlib Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll ---------------------------------------- BSMiniRPT Assembly Version: 1.0.1.0 Win32 Version: 1.0.1.0 CodeBase: file:///G:/wc7beta/BSMiniRPT.exe ---------------------------------------- Microsoft.VisualBasic Assembly Version: 8.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 8.0.50727.42 (RTM.050727-4200) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/8.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll ---------------------------------------- System Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll ---------------------------------------- System.Windows.Forms Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll ---------------------------------------- System.Drawing Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll ---------------------------------------- System.Configuration Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll ---------------------------------------- System.Xml Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll ---------------------------------------- System.Runtime.Remoting Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) CodeBase: file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll ---------------------------------------- --- I could really use some .NET real world insight here from experienced
VB.NET people here. I found the utility CASPOL.EXE and noticed if I do: start caspol -s off then I can run the EXE/DLL without the security from a remove drive. Off hand, I would ask: How do I do this programmatically? but even if possible (allowed), that is probably not a good idea without fully understanding the logic. Is this where I need to "create a manifest" or something that bundles my security exclusions with the DLL or EXE? Do I need to sign the DLL and will that cover the sub-assemblies it references? e.g.; mscorlib.dll? -- Show quoteHide quoteMike wrote: > I'm not quite getting the security of .NET. Maybe someone can give the > basic issue here so I can see the patten and better understand it with > the written docs. > > For now, until I understand what is going on I would like to remove it > to get full control of my RPC client/server framework which is already > secured in its own rights and installed by corporate operators in > secured computer rooms environments. I need to get the package running > as always. > > In short, the clients, are .NET applications using our new .NET SDK > class library DLL. The package can be installed on local machines, > computer rooms on networks so I really need to get control of this. > > What I have is an exe and dll > > Wildcat.net.server.dll <-- our .NET SDK API DLL > BSMiniRPT.exe <-- SDK example > > I copied these from my local D: drive to my network shared G: drive and > tried to run it. I get the report below. I also tried to do what I > though would remove the security from the compiled EXE and I still get > the report below. > > What is it exactly do I need to look for to begin testing the .net work > with field testers who have no restrictions where they install our > server and/or run the client applications? > > ************** Exception Text ************** > System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type > 'System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission, mscorlib, > Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed. > at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand, > StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet) > at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand() > at System.Environment.GetCommandLineArgs() > at BSMiniRPT.frmMain.frmMain_Load(Object eventSender, EventArgs > eventArgs) > at System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl() > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m) > at > System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, > IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) > The action that failed was: > Demand > The type of the first permission that failed was: > System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission > The Zone of the assembly that failed was: > Intranet > > > ************** Loaded Assemblies ************** > mscorlib > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll > ---------------------------------------- > BSMiniRPT > Assembly Version: 1.0.1.0 > Win32 Version: 1.0.1.0 > CodeBase: file:///G:/wc7beta/BSMiniRPT.exe > ---------------------------------------- > Microsoft.VisualBasic > Assembly Version: 8.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 8.0.50727.42 (RTM.050727-4200) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/8.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System.Windows.Forms > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System.Drawing > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System.Configuration > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System.Xml > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > System.Runtime.Remoting > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll > > ---------------------------------------- > > --- On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:03:28 -0400, Mike <unkn***@unknown.tv> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >I could really use some .NET real world insight here from experienced As far as I know your two choices are:>VB.NET people here. > >I found the utility CASPOL.EXE and noticed if I do: > > start caspol -s off > >then I can run the EXE/DLL without the security from a remove drive. > >Off hand, I would ask: > > How do I do this programmatically? > >but even if possible (allowed), that is probably not a good idea >without fully understanding the logic. > >Is this where I need to "create a manifest" or something that bundles >my security exclusions with the DLL or EXE? > >Do I need to sign the DLL and will that cover the sub-assemblies it >references? e.g.; mscorlib.dll? 1. Run caspol on each workstation, which changes the security for everything on the share, not just your program. I do not know other implications of this. 2. Install .NET 3.5 SP1. Your app does not have to target 3.5, this service pack changes the security rules for all 2.0 and higher apps to allow them to run from network shares. Jack Jackson wrote:
> As far as I know your two choices are: Does it relax it? I might have heard wrong, but for VS 2010, > 1. Run caspol on each workstation, which changes the security for > everything on the share, not just your program. I do not know other > implications of this. > > 2. Install .NET 3.5 SP1. Your app does not have to target 3.5, this > service pack changes the security rules for all 2.0 and higher apps to > allow them to run from network shares. Microsoft has reverted or done something so that this isn't so unpredictable or the developer has more precise control. Not sure since I am catching up to all this. I'll read up more on the security rules patch. This comment in MSDN was very puzzling and concerning: Partial Trust ... What is not allowed in partial trust? That is not easy to determine. Each class and each method of each class in the .NET Framework has a security attribute that defines the level of trust needed to run that method, and that attribute may not be accessible at run time because of just these security features. I hope MS makes this a non-issue to help minimize any exploitation caused by the frustrations of developers and users lowering their guards because they can't get anything done or isn't straight forward - my security hat opinion. What I did just now was to use MSCORCFG.MSC to alter the local intranet setting. This change will be great for internal development and testing but of course, I can't tell customers to do this. So I would like to be able to sandbox our own customer trusted apps. The problem seems to be that while I can change the permission for the EXE and our DLL, I haven't figure out how to change all the dependencies (the partial trust issue above). I did see I can create my own Code Group but have not seen yet how to apply it to the applications and dll, i.e, how do you assign it to the application or assembly? This appears as the sandbox solution I need to figure out. This MSDN C# example on how to System.Security.Permissions programmatically did not work for me: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288469(VS.71).aspx#vcwlksecuritytutorialsuppressingsecurity until I added full trust to the Local Intranet setting via MSCORCFG.MSC which of course, made those commands useless. It seems to be a chicken and egg thing. You need to start an application on a local drive, then change the permission and change directory to a shared drive and continue the process. :-) Thanks for your input. -- Jack, these links are proving to be useful:
The Simple Sandboxing API http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/08/449050.aspx And I haven't read it all yet, but 4.0 supposedly makes all is work like native code one again with the EXE controlling what security is used. So it seems like we are coming to a full circle. :-) -- Show quoteHide quoteMike wrote: > Jack Jackson wrote: > >> As far as I know your two choices are: >> 1. Run caspol on each workstation, which changes the security for >> everything on the share, not just your program. I do not know other >> implications of this. > > >> 2. Install .NET 3.5 SP1. Your app does not have to target 3.5, this >> service pack changes the security rules for all 2.0 and higher apps to >> allow them to run from network shares. > > Does it relax it? I might have heard wrong, but for VS 2010, Microsoft > has reverted or done something so that this isn't so unpredictable or > the developer has more precise control. Not sure since I am catching up > to all this. I'll read up more on the security rules patch. This > comment in MSDN was very puzzling and concerning: > > Partial Trust > > ... > > What is not allowed in partial trust? That is not easy to > determine. Each class and each method of each class in the .NET > Framework has a security attribute that defines the level of > trust needed to run that method, and that attribute may not be > accessible at run time because of just these security features. > > I hope MS makes this a non-issue to help minimize any exploitation > caused by the frustrations of developers and users lowering their guards > because they can't get anything done or isn't straight forward - my > security hat opinion. > > What I did just now was to use MSCORCFG.MSC to alter the local intranet > setting. This change will be great for internal development and > testing but of course, I can't tell customers to do this. So I would > like to be able to sandbox our own customer trusted apps. > > The problem seems to be that while I can change the permission for the > EXE and our DLL, I haven't figure out how to change all the dependencies > (the partial trust issue above). > > I did see I can create my own Code Group but have not seen yet how to > apply it to the applications and dll, i.e, how do you assign it to the > application or assembly? This appears as the sandbox solution I need to > figure out. > > This MSDN C# example on how to System.Security.Permissions > programmatically did not work for me: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288469(VS.71).aspx#vcwlksecuritytutorialsuppressingsecurity > > > until I added full trust to the Local Intranet setting via MSCORCFG.MSC > which of course, made those commands useless. > > It seems to be a chicken and egg thing. You need to start an > application on a local drive, then change the permission and change > directory to a shared drive and continue the process. :-) > > Thanks for your input. > > -- Jack, just wish to pass on a note for the archives, that updating to
..NET SP2 resolved this intranet security load issue. Thanks again for your input. Mike wrote: Show quoteHide quote > Jack, these links are proving to be useful: > > The Simple Sandboxing API > http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/08/449050.aspx > > And I haven't read it all yet, but 4.0 supposedly makes all is work > like native code one again with the EXE controlling what security is used. > > So it seems like we are coming to a full circle. :-) > > -- > > Mike wrote: >> Jack Jackson wrote: >> >>> As far as I know your two choices are: >>> 1. Run caspol on each workstation, which changes the security for >>> everything on the share, not just your program. I do not know other >>> implications of this. >> > >>> 2. Install .NET 3.5 SP1. Your app does not have to target 3.5, this >>> service pack changes the security rules for all 2.0 and higher apps to >>> allow them to run from network shares. >> >> Does it relax it? I might have heard wrong, but for VS 2010, >> Microsoft has reverted or done something so that this isn't so >> unpredictable or the developer has more precise control. Not sure >> since I am catching up to all this. I'll read up more on the security >> rules patch. This comment in MSDN was very puzzling and concerning: >> >> Partial Trust >> >> ... >> >> What is not allowed in partial trust? That is not easy to >> determine. Each class and each method of each class in the .NET >> Framework has a security attribute that defines the level of >> trust needed to run that method, and that attribute may not be >> accessible at run time because of just these security features. >> >> I hope MS makes this a non-issue to help minimize any exploitation >> caused by the frustrations of developers and users lowering their >> guards because they can't get anything done or isn't straight forward >> - my security hat opinion. >> >> What I did just now was to use MSCORCFG.MSC to alter the local >> intranet setting. This change will be great for internal >> development and testing but of course, I can't tell customers to do >> this. So I would like to be able to sandbox our own customer trusted >> apps. >> >> The problem seems to be that while I can change the permission for the >> EXE and our DLL, I haven't figure out how to change all the >> dependencies (the partial trust issue above). >> >> I did see I can create my own Code Group but have not seen yet how to >> apply it to the applications and dll, i.e, how do you assign it to >> the application or assembly? This appears as the sandbox solution I >> need to figure out. >> >> This MSDN C# example on how to System.Security.Permissions >> programmatically did not work for me: >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288469(VS.71).aspx#vcwlksecuritytutorialsuppressingsecurity >> >> >> until I added full trust to the Local Intranet setting via >> MSCORCFG.MSC which of course, made those commands useless. >> >> It seems to be a chicken and egg thing. You need to start an >> application on a local drive, then change the permission and change >> directory to a shared drive and continue the process. :-) >> >> Thanks for your input. >> >> -- Mike,
The most important item in the days Net version 2.0 was released was "security". It is done almost completely in the attributes of the classes and some things you can do in real code. Not the most pleasant thing to do and therefore not a subject most people want to reply on in newsgroups in forums But there is a special newsgroup around security. Cor Show quoteHide quote "Mike" <unkn***@unknown.tv> wrote in message news:uAHdx9u4JHA.1712@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > I'm not quite getting the security of .NET. Maybe someone can give the > basic issue here so I can see the patten and better understand it with the > written docs. > > For now, until I understand what is going on I would like to remove it to > get full control of my RPC client/server framework which is already > secured in its own rights and installed by corporate operators in secured > computer rooms environments. I need to get the package running as always. > > In short, the clients, are .NET applications using our new .NET SDK class > library DLL. The package can be installed on local machines, computer > rooms on networks so I really need to get control of this. > > What I have is an exe and dll > > Wildcat.net.server.dll <-- our .NET SDK API DLL > BSMiniRPT.exe <-- SDK example > > I copied these from my local D: drive to my network shared G: drive and > tried to run it. I get the report below. I also tried to do what I though > would remove the security from the compiled EXE and I still get the report > below. > > What is it exactly do I need to look for to begin testing the .net work > with field testers who have no restrictions where they install our server > and/or run the client applications? > > ************** Exception Text ************** > System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type > 'System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission, mscorlib, > Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed. > at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand, > StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet) > at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand() > at System.Environment.GetCommandLineArgs() > at BSMiniRPT.frmMain.frmMain_Load(Object eventSender, EventArgs > eventArgs) > at System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl() > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& > m) > at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) > at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, > IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) > The action that failed was: > Demand > The type of the first permission that failed was: > System.Security.Permissions.EnvironmentPermission > The Zone of the assembly that failed was: > Intranet > > > ************** Loaded Assemblies ************** > mscorlib > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll > ---------------------------------------- > BSMiniRPT > Assembly Version: 1.0.1.0 > Win32 Version: 1.0.1.0 > CodeBase: file:///G:/wc7beta/BSMiniRPT.exe > ---------------------------------------- > Microsoft.VisualBasic > Assembly Version: 8.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 8.0.50727.42 (RTM.050727-4200) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/8.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System.Windows.Forms > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System.Drawing > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System.Configuration > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System.Xml > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll > ---------------------------------------- > System.Runtime.Remoting > Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0 > Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300) > CodeBase: > file:///F:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll > ---------------------------------------- > > --- Cor Ligthert[MVP] wrote:
> Mike, Yes, been catching up with the reading. Even even more changing is on > > The most important item in the days Net version 2.0 was released was > "security". > > It is done almost completely in the attributes of the classes and some > things you can do in real code. the horizon. > Not the most pleasant thing to do and therefore not a subject most This .NET security design evolution from 1.0 to present seems to be a > people want to reply on in newsgroups in forums classic case of Engineering SWAGGING (Scientific Wild Ass Guessing) - WOW! :-) > But there is a special newsgroup around security. Yes, just subscribed to it. Thanks for the reminder.--
Equality Test For Objects
getting error on record duplication Visual Studio 2008 hogging memory automating ie or webbrowser control VS.NET 2003 to VS.NET 2008 conversion Define irregularly shaped area in UserControl where controls may be dropped Selecting dates in SQL Server store the data that is entered in the datagriview store the data that is entered in the form Using the Cast Extension Method To Convert To String |
|||||||||||||||||||||||