|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
inputboxHello all,
Is it possible to change the names of OK and Cancel in input box ??? Thanks to all Yes,
That is done according to your culture settings I don't know what it is in your culture Cor Show quoteHide quote "friend" <lavanyaredd***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:40629d23-835b-45e5-be21-3d888414ec5d@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > Hello all, > > Is it possible to change the names of OK and Cancel in input box ??? > > Thanks to all
Show quote
Hide quote
On Jul 8, 10:22 am, "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <Notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> I am getting german Ok and cancel..i want to get in englishwrote: > Yes, > > That is done according to your culture settings > > I don't know what it is in your culture > > Cor > > "friend" <lavanyaredd***@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:40629d23-835b-45e5-be21-3d888414ec5d@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > > > Hello all, > > > Is it possible to change the names of OK and Cancel in input box ??? > > > Thanks to all > > friend wrote:
> Install an English OS version.> I am getting german Ok and cancel..i want to get in english Armin "Armin Zingler" <az.nospam@freenet.de> wrote in message Micro$oft don't make an English OS version, although they still insist on news:eTRTZr7$JHA.5040@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Install an English OS version. charging people living in England a massive premium for what they pretend is an English version but which is really a standard American version. Mike "Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> schrieb: Yep, that's true:>> Install an English OS version. > > Micro$oft don't make an English OS version, although they still insist on > charging people living in England a massive premium for what they pretend > is an English version but which is really a standard American version. The Old New Thing : Why isn't there a separate British English version of Windows? <URL:http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2009/06/08/9705183.aspx> -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/> "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> wrote in message The general consensus there is that Micro$oft didn't bother to make an news:O8EyRW%23$JHA.4376@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> [Mike Williams said] Micro$oft don't make an English OS version, >> although they still insist on charging people living in England a massive >> premium for what they pretend is an English version but which is >> really a standard American version. > > [Herfried K. Wagner said] Yep, that's true: The Old New Thing : > Why isn't there a separate British English version of Windows? > <URL:http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2009/06/08/9705183.aspx> English version of Windoze because they wanted to spend their money making versions for countries which would otherwise be locked out of a fully usable (to them) version rather than waste money (as they saw it) making a version for a country with a language that was already mutually intelligible with American English? So why are charging us here in England a massive premium for something they have not actually done! And why are they doing 'under the counter' and legally questionable deals with people like Amazon in order to keep it that way! Mind you, I suppose it's what you can expect from a company that does busines like this . . . http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=6124&pn=1 Mike American English is the English version. No one talks British English but
the British. If the English version costs so much more in England, maybe you should buy a copy on a trip to the USA. Show quoteHide quote "Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message news:%23Ig$027$JHA.4168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > "Armin Zingler" <az.nospam@freenet.de> wrote in message > news:eTRTZr7$JHA.5040@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > >> Install an English OS version. > > Micro$oft don't make an English OS version, although they still insist on > charging people living in England a massive premium for what they pretend > is an English version but which is really a standard American version. > > Mike > "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message No its not. That's the American version.news:eriw55%23$JHA.3696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > American English is the English version. > No one talks British English but the British. You might just as well say no one talks German but the Germans!> If the English version costs so much more in England, Right, so I'll travel all the way over to America in order to buy a copy of > maybe you should buy a copy on a trip to the USA. Windoze! Is that what you suggest everybody should do? What an idiotic response! Mike "Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message American is English.news:uVVsmw$$JHA.4432@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message > news:eriw55%23$JHA.3696@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> American English is the English version. > > No its not. That's the American version. > At last count, 96% of Americans speak English. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language Microsoft is an American company. What major differences are there between American English and BBC English which would pertain to Windows? How many languages are there in the world? How many languages is Windows published in? How many dialects do you expect Windows to handle? >> No one talks British English but the British. British English is not a different language from American English. It's a > > You might just as well say no one talks German but the Germans! > different dialect. There are various dialects of German as well, and I would expect software to normally only handle the most widely used one. >> If the English version costs so much more in England, Should I expect to pay the same for a German made car in America that I >> maybe you should buy a copy on a trip to the USA. > > Right, so I'll travel all the way over to America in order to buy a copy > of Windoze! Is that what you suggest everybody should do? What an idiotic > response! > > Mike > would pay in Germany? You wouldn't pay the same for a medicine in America that you would pay in Canada. Cigarettes in America are still far cheaper than they are in Europe. Prices normally vary by country for various reasons such as shipping costs, taxes, exchange rates, government subsidies, and legal fees imposed by countries on companies or industries. "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message Really?news:uSYqBAAAKHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > American is English. > How many dialects do you expect Windows to handle? I don't care how many languages or dialects it handles. That's not my concern. But I do expect it to be in the language of the person they are selling it to, especially if they charge a premium for it as they most certainly do here in England. > British English is not a different language from American Well actually I'd say that American is a different dialect of English.> English. It's a different dialect. > There are various dialects of German as well, and I would That's fine, as long as you don't charge extra for a dialect you are not > expect software to normally only handle the most widely > used one. supporting! > Should I expect to pay the same for a German made car in Copies of Windows sold in England are not made in America. They are made in > America that I would pay in Germany? Prices normally vary > by country for various reasons such as shipping costs . . . Ireland. It costs the equivalent of about 50 cents to ship a copy from Ireland to England, and in any case they are sold at a premium even in Ireland, where they are made! Micro$oft are just ripping us off. Mike "Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message There isn't an official language in the USA nationwide, but if you see a news:uYqHZRBAKHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message > news:uSYqBAAAKHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > >> American is English. > > Really? > Yes language selection that says USA it is English, to show the difference where sometimes British English is supported. I don't know the difference between the two, other than American language doesn't use goofy words like bangers. >> How many dialects do you expect Windows to handle? You just agreed with me and contradicted yourself. American English and > > I don't care how many languages or dialects it handles. That's not my > concern. But I do expect it to be in the language of the person they are > selling it to, especially if they charge a premium for it as they most > certainly do here in England. > >> British English is not a different language from American >> English. It's a different dialect. > > Well actually I'd say that American is a different dialect of English. > British BBC English are dialects of English. What language are you forced to buy? Are you expecting their OS to be in the language of the person they're selling it to, or in the dialect of the person they're selling it to? Odd that you "quoted" me but snipped out half of my message. I'll repeat one of the questions you ignored. What major differences are there between American English and BBC English which would pertain to Windows? >> There are various dialects of German as well, and I would This doesn't make any sense. Are they selling you a BBC English version and >> expect software to normally only handle the most widely >> used one. > > That's fine, as long as you don't charge extra for a dialect you are not > supporting! > not supporting it? I think you meant to say they're charging you extra for the supported dialect and they didn't bother to rewrite it in your dialect. >> Should I expect to pay the same for a German made car in You snipped out the key part. I'll repeat to see if you can get it in your >> America that I would pay in Germany? Prices normally vary >> by country for various reasons such as shipping costs . . . > > Copies of Windows sold in England are not made in America. They are made > in Ireland. It costs the equivalent of about 50 cents to ship a copy from > Ireland to England, and in any case they are sold at a premium even in > Ireland, where they are made! Micro$oft are just ripping us off. > > Mike > thick skull. "Prices normally vary by country for various reasons such as shipping costs, taxes, exchange rates, government subsidies, and legal fees imposed by countries on companies or industries." Last I heard, Microsoft is charging fees for software sold in all European countries to cover costs of the antitrust lawsuits Europe attacked them with. Are your cigarettes made in Ireland too? Why are cigarettes $4/pack in the USA and $9/pack in Europe? government imposed fees. lawsuit fees. Companies cover costs. Come to America to buy stuff or deal with it. "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message No I didn't. Perhaps my statement was a little bit too subtle for you? news:Oayv3iJAKHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> British English is not a different language from American >>> English. It's a different dialect. >> >> Well actually I'd say that American is a different dialect of English. > > You just agreed with me and contradicted yourself. English is the language (British English as you might call it over there) and American English is the dialect. > Odd that you "quoted" me but snipped out half of my message. That's because some of what you said was rubbish.> I'll repeat one of the questions you ignored. What major The spelling of many of the words is incorrect. For example "Windows Color > differences are there between American English and BBC > English which would pertain to Windows? and Appearance" is not English. > What language are you forced to buy? I'm not forced to buy and language version of Windows. I can buy whichever version I choose, or I can buy none at all. It is up to me. > Are you expecting their OS to be in the language of the That depends on how much they are charging me for it and on what excuses > person they're selling it to, or in the dialect of the person > they're selling it to? they are using for overcharging. Micro$oft have used many excuses for their habit of grossly overcharging people living in countries other than America and one of the excuses that they have rolled out regularly is the cost of converting the standard American version into local languages. Since my own language, English, is very similar to the native language of America then if they were not overcharging me on those grounds I would happily accept an American English version. However, they ARE overcharging me on those grounds and so I expect what I paid all that extra money for, a version converted into real English! > This doesn't make any sense. Yes it does.> Are they selling you a BBC English version and not supporting it? Of course not. They are not selling me an English version at all. But they ARE attempting to charge me extra for an American version and they are pretending that the reason they need to charge me extra is to cover the cost of producing local versions, which as far as English people is concerned is a lie because in our case they are NOT producing a local version! All I am asking for is what they are telling me they are charging me for! If they want to sell me the American version then that's fine, and I would happily accept it for what it is, were it not for the fact that I am being overcharged and lied to. By the way, I used the word "selling" very loosely because Micro$oft have not actually sold anything to me for a great many years, and they will not sell anything to me in the future. The last version of Windows I bought was the copy of Win98 that was installed in a PC I purchased many years ago, and it is the last Microsoft product I will ever buy. > Why are cigarettes $4/pack in the USA and $9/pack in Europe? Actually they are /not/ $9 per pack in many European countries, although they are the equivalent of about $8 or $9 per pack in England. But you obviously alreayd know the reason why such price differences exist and so I can only assume that you are asking the question in your attempt to cloud the issue. In America the tax on cigarettes is about $1 per pack whereas in England the tax is more than $6.50 per pack. But the similar reasons cannot possibly account for the huge amount we are being overcharged for Micro$oft products over here. The tax on software here is 17.5 per cent, which I think is not massively different than the total of the various taxes on software in America and which in any case cannot account for more than a tiny fraction of the huge amount that Micro$oft are overcharging! Perhaps I should think about moving to Nigeria, where the corporate gangsters not only provide cheap copies of Windows but in fact more than give them away, and 'make you an offer you can't refuse' by stealing the non-microsoft OS that you have already paid for so that they can forcibly and illegally foist a copy of Windows on you whether you want it or not! http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=6124&pn=1 Mike Again with the random snipping, making your post sound like complete
rubbish, so I have to paste in the appropriate quotes from the previous post so it makes sense.. Show quoteHide quote "Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message Are you talking about yourself or someone from another country? You say "I news:er3R6dMAKHA.4376@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message > news:Oayv3iJAKHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >>> I don't care how many languages or dialects it handles. That's not my >>> concern. But I do expect it to be in the language of the person they are >>> selling it to, especially if they charge a premium for it as they most >>> certainly do here in England. >>> >>>> British English is not a different language from American >>>> English. It's a different dialect. >>> >>> Well actually I'd say that American is a different dialect of English. >> >> You just agreed with me and contradicted yourself. > > No I didn't. Perhaps my statement was a little bit too subtle for you? > English is the language (British English as you might call it over there) > and American English is the dialect. > do expect it to be in the language of the person they are selling it to". Then you say "American is a different dialect of English". You say they're selling you an American version, so they're selling you an English version, so if you're not contradicting yourself then you're complaining that they're doing what you expect them to do (or talking about someone else looking for it in a different language?). The fact they don't make a version in your dialect is beside the point, though I don't know much about the BBC English (and you refuse to point out what major differences there are between the dialects which would directly relate to the OS), it sounds like you're arguing they don't use the goofy old spelling (color instead of colour). >> Odd that you "quoted" me but snipped out half of my message. Most of what you're saying sounds like rubbish but I'm still attempting to > > That's because some of what you said was rubbish. > understand and provide an answer. >> I'll repeat one of the questions you ignored. What major Color/Colour? What else is wrong with that? Is it hard to interpret or >> differences are there between American English and BBC >> English which would pertain to Windows? > > The spelling of many of the words is incorrect. For example "Windows Color > and Appearance" is not English. > just frustrating you to see it spelled the simpler American way? >> What language are you forced to buy? "forced to buy" was just a reference to your previous assertion that you > > I'm not forced to buy and language version of Windows. I can buy whichever > version I choose, or I can buy none at all. It is up to me. > "expect it to be in the language of the person they are selling it to". I was assuming you were referring to yourself as the "person they are selling it to" and to English as your language and wondering what language(s) are available for you to buy if not English, since we've already established that American and British/BBC are just different dialects of the English language. Show quoteHide quote >> Are you expecting their OS to be in the language of the Do you have a link to a statement from Microsoft saying they charge more for >> person they're selling it to, or in the dialect of the person >> they're selling it to? > > That depends on how much they are charging me for it and on what excuses > they are using for overcharging. Micro$oft have used many excuses for > their habit of grossly overcharging people living in countries other than > America and one of the excuses that they have rolled out regularly is the > cost of converting the standard American version into local languages. > Since my own language, English, is very similar to the native language of > America then if they were not overcharging me on those grounds I would > happily accept an American English version. However, they ARE overcharging > me on those grounds and so I expect what I paid all that extra money for, > a version converted into real English! > an American English language OS in England than in America because they're "converting it to your local language"? England is part of Europe. I always heard they charge more for all of their products in all of Europe to cover the cost of the antitrust lawsuits they get over there. >>>>> There are various dialects of German as well, and I would How can they charge extra for something they're not selling? I'd like to >>>>> expect software to normally only handle the most widely >>>>> used one. >>>> >>> That's fine, as long as you don't charge extra for a dialect you are not >>> supporting! >>> >> This doesn't make any sense. > > Yes it does. > see a reference to where you heard that. It sounds like you're saying MS is like a car company that makes cars with the steering wheel on the left side and you would like one on the right side instead so they're going to charge you extra for one with the wheel on the left side. Either that or you're saying they are providing a British dialect version and they won't help you if you have any problems with it? I thought you established that they're only offering an American dialect version. Show quoteHide quote >> Are they selling you a BBC English version and not supporting it? Why are you bothering to complain about software you're running without a > > Of course not. They are not selling me an English version at all. But they > ARE attempting to charge me extra for an American version and they are > pretending that the reason they need to charge me extra is to cover the > cost of producing local versions, which as far as English people is > concerned is a lie because in our case they are NOT producing a local > version! All I am asking for is what they are telling me they are charging > me for! If they want to sell me the American version then that's fine, and > I would happily accept it for what it is, were it not for the fact that I > am being overcharged and lied to. > > By the way, I used the word "selling" very loosely because Micro$oft have > not actually sold anything to me for a great many years, and they will not > sell anything to me in the future. The last version of Windows I bought > was the copy of Win98 that was installed in a PC I purchased many years > ago, and it is the last Microsoft product I will ever buy. > license? Show quoteHide quote >> Why are cigarettes $4/pack in the USA and $9/pack in Europe? You're the one attempting to cloud issues. I'm trying to make sense of it. > > Actually they are /not/ $9 per pack in many European countries, although > they are the equivalent of about $8 or $9 per pack in England. But you > obviously alreayd know the reason why such price differences exist and so > I can only assume that you are asking the question in your attempt to > cloud the issue. In America the tax on cigarettes is about $1 per pack > whereas in England the tax is more than $6.50 per pack. But the similar > reasons cannot possibly account for the huge amount we are being > overcharged for Micro$oft products over here. The tax on software here is > 17.5 per cent, which I think is not massively different than the total of > the various taxes on software in America and which in any case cannot > account for more than a tiny fraction of the huge amount that Micro$oft > are overcharging! > 17.5% tax would explain the difference. The only "software tax" I'm aware of in the USA is our sales tax which varies by state. In my state that's 6%. Our tax is not applied to the base price. Is yours? If not, if you're saying the base price is higher in England, that would be from MS passing on the fees on their end, such as legal fees (to include the antitrust suits) and production fees (such as a property tax on their Ireland factory). > Perhaps I should think about moving to Nigeria, where the corporate Maybe you should move to China. They have plenty of pirates who can get you > gangsters not only provide cheap copies of Windows but in fact more than > give them away, and 'make you an offer you can't refuse' by stealing the > non-microsoft OS that you have already paid for so that they can forcibly > and illegally foist a copy of Windows on you whether you want it or not! > > http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=6124&pn=1 > > Mike > any software super cheap. I hear they sell pirated copies of DVD movies for $1 before the movies are even in theaters. Of course if you want overall cheap living move someplace like Iraq where I hear the cost of living is about $500USD/year. "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message Myself.news:%23SOX45MAKHA.1536@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Are you talking about yourself or someone from another country? > You say "I do expect it to be in the language of the person they Both of those statements are true. Saying that I do expect it to be in the > are selling it to". Then you say "American is a different dialect > of English". /language/ of the person they are selling it to does NOT necessarily mean that I do not also expect it to be in the required /dialect/. I might require one or both of those things, depending on the circumstances. I expect a copy of Windoze to be in my own language, and if a translation is required from American English then I am happy to pay a premium for the service. So if for example I lived in Germany and I wanted a German version of Windoze then I would expect to be charged a premium for it (although not such an exorbitantly large premium as Micro$oft are actually charging). So in such a case I would expect it to be in my own language (German in this example). However, if I live in England (as I do) and I want an English version of Windoze and if Micro$oft still insist on forcing me to pay a similar premium for it then I expect it not to merely be in English but to be in British English and NOT in American English. If Micro$oft provide me with an American English version then they should not charge me extra on the grounds of localisation, since they have not localised it. Therefore in order to get what they are expecting me to pay for I expect them to convert it to British English. To fail to do so and yet to still charge me a premium which is at least in part intended to cover localisation would be dishonest, but then dishonesty is a Micro$oft trademark so I suppose I should not be surprised! > it sounds like you're arguing they don't use the You can call it goofy if you wish, but it is the correct English spelling of > goofy old spelling (color instead of colour). the word colour. If Micro$oft charge me a premium for Windoze and if they or anyone else tell me that part of that premium is to cover the cost of localisation, and if they have not been required to perform a language translation then yes, of course I expect the spellings to be correct Bitish English. They have not been required to convert into my own language, since it was already in a dialect of English, and if they also fail to convert it into British English then they have dishonestly charged me a premium for something they have not actually done. I notice that you have not responded at all to my comments about Micro$oft's corporate ganster activities in Nigeria . . . http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=6124&pn=1 .. . . although you are obviously a Micro$oft stooge I would expect you to even attempt to defend their activities there, so perhaps it is time to completely ignore you. Mike
Show quote
Hide quote
"Mike Williams" <M***@WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message So,news:u7ClIWNAKHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message > news:%23SOX45MAKHA.1536@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> Are you talking about yourself or someone from another country? > > Myself. > >> You say "I do expect it to be in the language of the person they >> are selling it to". Then you say "American is a different dialect >> of English". > > Both of those statements are true. Saying that I do expect it to be in the > /language/ of the person they are selling it to does NOT necessarily mean > that I do not also expect it to be in the required /dialect/. I might > require one or both of those things, depending on the circumstances. > > I expect a copy of Windoze to be in my own language, and if a translation > is required from American English then I am happy to pay a premium for the > service. So if for example I lived in Germany and I wanted a German > version of Windoze then I would expect to be charged a premium for it > (although not such an exorbitantly large premium as Micro$oft are actually > charging). So in such a case I would expect it to be in my own language > (German in this example). > > However, if I live in England (as I do) and I want an English version of > Windoze and if Micro$oft still insist on forcing me to pay a similar > premium for it then I expect it not to merely be in English but to be in > British English and NOT in American English. If Micro$oft provide me with > an American English version then they should not charge me extra on the > grounds of localisation, since they have not localised it. Therefore in > order to get what they are expecting me to pay for I expect them to > convert it to British English. To fail to do so and yet to still charge me > a premium which is at least in part intended to cover localisation would > be dishonest, but then dishonesty is a Micro$oft trademark so I suppose I > should not be surprised! > >> it sounds like you're arguing they don't use the >> goofy old spelling (color instead of colour). > > You can call it goofy if you wish, but it is the correct English spelling > of the word colour. If Micro$oft charge me a premium for Windoze and if > they or anyone else tell me that part of that premium is to cover the cost > of localisation, and if they have not been required to perform a language > translation then yes, of course I expect the spellings to be correct > Bitish English. They have not been required to convert into my own > language, since it was already in a dialect of English, and if they also > fail to convert it into British English then they have dishonestly charged > me a premium for something they have not actually done. > > I notice that you have not responded at all to my comments about > Micro$oft's corporate ganster activities in Nigeria . . . > > http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=6124&pn=1 > > . . . although you are obviously a Micro$oft stooge I would expect you to > even attempt to defend their activities there, so perhaps it is time to > completely ignore you. > > Mike > 1) You don't think it's enough that they provide a version in the language of every country they sell a copy in, but they should translate to the dialects too, that if the major language of every country in the middle east is arabic but each country primarily uses a different dialect they should all get their own translation paid for by MS? 2) You still haven't provided the link to where MS said the cost difference between America and England is primarily due to translations, though I've given you other possible reasons. I don't know what "gangster activities in Nigeria" might have to do with the cost of Windows. I certainly wouldn't defend MS. If you want to discuss the cost of Windows in Nigeria there's a whole separate set of issues. "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message That is NOT what I said, and you know very well it is not. You are a liar, news:O7M2rhNAKHA.2604@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > So, > 1) You don't think it's enough that they provide a version > in the language of every country they sell a copy in, but > they should translate to the dialects too . . . Eric. I actually said: "If Micro$oft provide me with an American English version then they should not charge me extra on the grounds of localisation, since they have not localised it. Therefore in order to get what they are expecting me to pay for I expect them to convert it to British English". The above is quite different to what you accused me of saying. You are a liar. This thread is therefore at an end as far as I am concerned. I do not wish to converse with a liar. Mike Mike -
Actually, most of the English-speaking world speaks British English, not American English. You need to get out more. Martin *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** "Martin" <surveyman45-groupw***@yahoo.com> wrote in message You sound confused.news:Of0qR6$$JHA.5040@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > Mike - > > Actually, most of the English-speaking world speaks British English, not > American English. You need to get out more. > > Martin > > > *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** 1) Mike was arguing FOR British English. 2) Most of the English speaking world speaks American English. According to the Wikipedia chart (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language), the USA is #1 for English speakers and has more than the #2, 3, and 4 countries combined (including UK). Add to that the #5-6 countries (Philippines, Canada), and the rapidly growing English speaking population of China, which would also favor American English and it's by far the primary dialect. Eric,
They forget that Shakespeare was from a city near Birmingham Alabama :-) CorShow quoteHide quote "Eric" <someone@idontwantspam.com> wrote in message news:eka3hMAAKHA.4336@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > "Martin" <surveyman45-groupw***@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Of0qR6$$JHA.5040@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> Mike - >> >> Actually, most of the English-speaking world speaks British English, not >> American English. You need to get out more. >> >> Martin >> >> >> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** > > You sound confused. > 1) Mike was arguing FOR British English. > 2) Most of the English speaking world speaks American English. > According to the Wikipedia chart > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language), the USA is #1 for English > speakers and has more than the #2, 3, and 4 countries combined (including > UK). Add to that the #5-6 countries (Philippines, Canada), and the > rapidly growing English speaking population of China, which would also > favor American English and it's by far the primary dialect. >
How do I create new app with data access?
Concurrency error on update VB.NET Charting Solution HTML, CSS and JavaScript in a Gridview System.OutOfMemory exception error How To :App.Config is this possible? Pass a structure to a C++ dll Duplicated data - how to understand it please? Floating Point Math Problem |
|||||||||||||||||||||||