|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
VersionsHi,
A quick question (not a programmer) The verisons for VB are (in decending order) VB 2005 VB .NET 2003 VB .NET 2002 VB 6.0 VB 5.0 Thank you in advance Peter VB 3.0 should be in there too!!!!
Show quoteHide quote "Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... > Hi, > A quick question (not a programmer) > > The verisons for VB are (in decending order) > > VB 2005 > VB .NET 2003 > VB .NET 2002 > VB 6.0 > VB 5.0 > > Thank you in advance > > Peter > > Hi Robin,
Thank you for responding Then this would be correct in decending order VB 2005 VB .NET 2003 VB .NET 2002 VB 6.0 VB 5.0 VB 3.0 Thank you Show quoteHide quote "Robin Tucker" wrote: > VB 3.0 should be in there too!!!! > > "Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... > > Hi, > > A quick question (not a programmer) > > > > The verisons for VB are (in decending order) > > > > VB 2005 > > VB .NET 2003 > > VB .NET 2002 > > VB 6.0 > > VB 5.0 > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > Peter > > > > > > > Peter,
If you are still interested you missed couple on the bottom. VB 4.0 and, ever dear to my heart, VB for DOS (i.e. 1.0) - - - - - - - - - - - VB 2005 VB .NET 2003 VB .NET 2002 VB 6.0 VB 5.0 VB 4.0 VB 3.0 VB for DOS (1.0) - - - - - - - - - - - Don't remember 2.0. Show quoteHide quote "Peter Waugh" wrote: > Hi Robin, > Thank you for responding > Then this would be correct in decending order > > VB 2005 > VB .NET 2003 > VB .NET 2002 > VB 6.0 > VB 5.0 > VB 3.0 > > Thank you > > "Robin Tucker" wrote: > > > VB 3.0 should be in there too!!!! > > > > "Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... > > > Hi, > > > A quick question (not a programmer) > > > > > > The verisons for VB are (in decending order) > > > > > > VB 2005 > > > VB .NET 2003 > > > VB .NET 2002 > > > VB 6.0 > > > VB 5.0 > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > and vb4 was realy two versions - 16 and 32 bit!
kermit wrote: Show quoteHide quote > Peter, > > If you are still interested you missed couple on the bottom. VB 4.0 and, > ever dear to my heart, VB for DOS (i.e. 1.0) > > - - - - - - - - - - - > VB 2005 > VB .NET 2003 > VB .NET 2002 > VB 6.0 > VB 5.0 > VB 4.0 > VB 3.0 > VB for DOS (1.0) > - - - - - - - - - - - > Don't remember 2.0. > > "Peter Waugh" wrote: > > >>Hi Robin, >>Thank you for responding >>Then this would be correct in decending order >> >>VB 2005 >>VB .NET 2003 >>VB .NET 2002 >>VB 6.0 >>VB 5.0 >>VB 3.0 >> >>Thank you >> >>"Robin Tucker" wrote: >> >> >>>VB 3.0 should be in there too!!!! >>> >>>"Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>>news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... >>> >>>>Hi, >>>>A quick question (not a programmer) >>>> >>>>The verisons for VB are (in decending order) >>>> >>>>VB 2005 >>>>VB .NET 2003 >>>>VB .NET 2002 >>>>VB 6.0 >>>>VB 5.0 >>>> >>>>Thank you in advance >>>> >>>>Peter >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> kermit,
There is also VB 2.0 & VB 1.0 for Windows, both of which were 16 bit. Also don't forget about VBA, of which I know of 2 or 3 varieties (the original version in Excel, the a "newer" version (5.0?) in Office, then the "latest" version (6.*?) in Office. VBA 6 & VB 6 shared the same core language & runtime. My understanding the compiler & IDE used changes.... AccessBasic in Access 1.0 might be considered VB, however it did have the name AccessBasic. I forget which version of Access gained VBA. Then of course there is VBScript. Hope this helps Jay Show quoteHide quote "kermit" <ker***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:296729A2-4FA1-471D-B185-ACCAC9215CC1@microsoft.com... | Peter, | | If you are still interested you missed couple on the bottom. VB 4.0 and, | ever dear to my heart, VB for DOS (i.e. 1.0) | | - - - - - - - - - - - | VB 2005 | VB .NET 2003 | VB .NET 2002 | VB 6.0 | VB 5.0 | VB 4.0 | VB 3.0 | VB for DOS (1.0) | - - - - - - - - - - - | Don't remember 2.0. | | "Peter Waugh" wrote: | | > Hi Robin, | > Thank you for responding | > Then this would be correct in decending order | > | > VB 2005 | > VB .NET 2003 | > VB .NET 2002 | > VB 6.0 | > VB 5.0 | > VB 3.0 | > | > Thank you | > | > "Robin Tucker" wrote: | > | > > VB 3.0 should be in there too!!!! | > > | > > "Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message | > > news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... | > > > Hi, | > > > A quick question (not a programmer) | > > > | > > > The verisons for VB are (in decending order) | > > > | > > > VB 2005 | > > > VB .NET 2003 | > > > VB .NET 2002 | > > > VB 6.0 | > > > VB 5.0 | > > > | > > > Thank you in advance | > > > | > > > Peter | > > > | > > > | > > | > > | > > Peter,
> A quick question (not a programmer) I would not say it this way, there are as well versions for VBS and VBA, > > The verisons for VB are (in decending order) > > VB 2005 > VB .NET 2003 > VB .NET 2002 > VB 6.0 > VB 5.0 > when you clearly ask "VB" that are in my opinion real VB language versions which are probably used by the most "VB" programmers. I hope this helps, Cor Ligthert, noone cares....
Show quoteHide quote "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstn***@planet.nl> wrote in message news:%23SdBg4JfFHA.2372@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Peter, > >> A quick question (not a programmer) >> >> The verisons for VB are (in decending order) >> >> VB 2005 >> VB .NET 2003 >> VB .NET 2002 >> VB 6.0 >> VB 5.0 >> > I would not say it this way, there are as well versions for VBS and VBA, > when you clearly ask "VB" that are in my opinion real VB language versions > which are probably used by the most "VB" programmers. > > I hope this helps, > > Cor > "Peter Waugh" <PeterWa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message Visual Basic 2005news:B241DF43-124B-4FAB-9F87-F3FE616FD17B@microsoft.com... > The versons for VB are (in decending order) Visual Basic (.NET) 2003 Visual Basic (.NET) 2002 VB 6.0 VB 5.0 VB 4.0 VB 3.0 I would still suggest (even now) that a distinction needs to be made between VB 6 (the last version of VB "Proper") and the "grown-up", fully Object oriented, etc., etc., etc. versions of "Visual Basic". Thank you for not simply calling them VB 7, VB 7.1 and VB 8. ;-) Regards, Phill W. Show quoteHide quote > > Thank you in advance > > Peter > > "Phill. W" <P.A.Ward@o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-k> schrieb: Visual Basic 7.0, Visual Basic 7.1, and Visual Basic 8.0 are the names of > Thank you for not simply calling them VB 7, VB 7.1 and VB 8. ;-) the programming language, Visual Basic .NET 2002, Visual Basic .NET 2003, and Visual Basic 2005 are the product names. -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/> Hi Herfried,
Again a distinction between language and product name ;-) Just curious, was there any difference between VB 7.0 and VB 7.1? I know that the .NET Frameworks have some differences, and the IDEs too, but the languages? -- Show quoteHide quoteBest regards, Carlos J. Quintero MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET, VB6, VB5 and VBA You can code, design and document much faster. Free resources for add-in developers: http://www.mztools.com "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> escribió en el mensaje news:OlUhWTKfFHA.3936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Visual Basic 7.0, Visual Basic 7.1, and Visual Basic 8.0 are the names of > the programming language, Visual Basic .NET 2002, Visual Basic .NET 2003, > and Visual Basic 2005 are the product names. Carlos,
| Again a distinction between language and product name ;-) FWIW:http://www.panopticoncentral.net/archive/2005/06/13/9544.aspx | Just curious, was there any difference between VB 7.0 and VB 7.1? I know VB 7.1 gained the left shift and right shift operators,| that the .NET Frameworks have some differences, and the IDEs too, but the | languages? Dim i As Integer i = i << 2 ' shift left 2 bit positions i = i >> 2 ' shift right 2 bit positions VB 7.1 also gained defining the type inline on the For & For Each statements. For Each item As Object In collection ... Next For index As Integer = 0 to 10 ... Next For details on the above 2 items see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcn7/html/valrfWhatsNewInVisualBasicLanguage.asp For the plethora of additions to VB 8.0 see: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/we86c8x2(en-us,vs.80).aspx Hope this helps Jay Show quoteHide quote "Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP]" <carlosq@NOSPAMsogecable.com> wrote in message news:e51jpLLfFHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... | Hi Herfried, | | Again a distinction between language and product name ;-) | | Just curious, was there any difference between VB 7.0 and VB 7.1? I know | that the .NET Frameworks have some differences, and the IDEs too, but the | languages? | | | -- | Best regards, | | Carlos J. Quintero | | MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET, VB6, VB5 and VBA | You can code, design and document much faster. | Free resources for add-in developers: | http://www.mztools.com | | | "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> escribió en el mensaje | news:OlUhWTKfFHA.3936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... | | > Visual Basic 7.0, Visual Basic 7.1, and Visual Basic 8.0 are the names of | > the programming language, Visual Basic .NET 2002, Visual Basic .NET 2003, | > and Visual Basic 2005 are the product names. | | In .net 2003 i can do:
for i as integer = 0 to 10 next couldn't do that in 2002 Greetz Peter -- Show quoteHide quoteProgramming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. "Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP]" <carlosq@NOSPAMsogecable.com> schreef in bericht news:e51jpLLfFHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Hi Herfried, > > Again a distinction between language and product name ;-) > > Just curious, was there any difference between VB 7.0 and VB 7.1? I know > that the .NET Frameworks have some differences, and the IDEs too, but the > languages? > > > -- > Best regards, > > Carlos J. Quintero > > MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET, VB6, VB5 and VBA > You can code, design and document much faster. > Free resources for add-in developers: > http://www.mztools.com > > > "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> escribió en el mensaje > news:OlUhWTKfFHA.3936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > > > Visual Basic 7.0, Visual Basic 7.1, and Visual Basic 8.0 are the names of > > the programming language, Visual Basic .NET 2002, Visual Basic .NET 2003, > > and Visual Basic 2005 are the product names. > > 
Other interesting topics
Adding Columns to Jet/Access database
System.Type - structure Deployment packages get mouseeventargs how to reference strognly typed dataset up mulitple projects TreeView Question avicap32.dll issues (Is Ken Tucker Around?) Passing parameters to 2nd form issue Load class library at runtime UnloadMode |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
