|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Let's be honest."Counterfeit copies of software are illegal in many places, less reliable than authorized copies, and unsupportable because of the risks they pose[...]" It ought to be illegal everywhere. Trouble is how is it going to be enforced and with what dedication? Microsoft is taking an initiative I hope succeeds. But I have doubts. How is pirated software less reliable? In my book that is an excuse for software that IS unreliable. Which I have mentioned about bona fide Microsoft software many times. What are the risks with unsupportable software? To me it is more risky going down the associated road of support such as security updates than not. Not always but there is a risk involved in installing Microsoft's Hodgepodge of security fixes and I don't want to read any damn crap about that risk. You know it is there and those that excuse it are likely prone to disimulation in other regards. Such as Microsoft themselves. -- George Hester _______________________________ You speak the truth. Im sure this whole thing is directed towards home users
that do not know much. Pirated software IS usually VERY reliable and less annoying. The risks of software being unsupported are: Microsoft doesnt make any money from people calling asking how to jump through all these hoops n loops of "validating" & "updating" Probably none to the end user since if they are using pirated software they know enough to solve problems themselves and not call microsoft. -- Show quoteHide quote"Talk Nerdy to Me" "George Hester" wrote: > http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/update/genuine.mspx > > "Counterfeit copies of software are illegal in many places, less reliable > than authorized copies, and unsupportable because of the risks they > pose[...]" > > It ought to be illegal everywhere. Trouble is how is it going to be > enforced and with what dedication? Microsoft is taking an initiative I hope > succeeds. But I have doubts. > > How is pirated software less reliable? In my book that is an excuse for > software that IS unreliable. Which I have mentioned about bona fide > Microsoft software many times. > > What are the risks with unsupportable software? To me it is more risky > going down the associated road of support such as security updates than not. > Not always but there is a risk involved in installing Microsoft's Hodgepodge > of security fixes and I don't want to read any damn crap about that risk. > You know it is there and those that excuse it are likely prone to > disimulation in other regards. Such as Microsoft themselves. > > -- > George Hester > _______________________________ > > As a Windows user since 1990 starting with Windows 3.0 - I have been saying
and thinking ditto for years. Has Microsoft and the industry in general been honest to the hardware and software consumers? Was the emphasis on profit and not quality control? Buyer beware versus building consumer trust? How many dollars did we spend on worthless hardware & software, both retail and OEM, also discovering that so-called tech support was a crying scam. Did anyone laugh as bitterly as I whenever Gates mentioned the word "INNOVATION?" How many times did Microsoft users find their online troubleshooting "Help" articles advise you to ask the network 'administrator' when you were the administrator? Great technical writing! My last PC came with an OEM Windows WP. All the routine problems I was having with XP vanished when I downgraded to Windows 2000 - in my opinion and experience,the only stable worthwhile OS Microsoft ever produced. I never used a pirated product but I will never go to another OS unless it's Linux or a pirated Microsoft OS. I figure I already paid the price for buggy, over hyped Microsoft software and updates big time. Show quoteHide quote "George Hester" <hesterl***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:enC9kjbnFHA.1148@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/update/genuine.mspx > > "Counterfeit copies of software are illegal in many places, less reliable > than authorized copies, and unsupportable because of the risks they > pose[...]" > > It ought to be illegal everywhere. Trouble is how is it going to be > enforced and with what dedication? Microsoft is taking an initiative I hope > succeeds. But I have doubts. >
Error 1053 - Cannot Start / Stop any services.
Last ditch repair of crashing W2K box...ideas?!?!?! Win2K SP4 + error 1053 when I try to start service Microsoft Update error 0x8DDD0002 Taking forever to logon!! Win 2000 Pro Will Not Boot Service Packs On CD problem with booting win 2000 Windows 2000 Pro backup and restore How do I save user's My Documents on the server? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||