|
web
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Windows 2000 backup restore problemWe're using the Windows 2000 backup software Version 5.0 on a Dell 530
desktop to backup data to a Dell Powervault 110T DELT VS 80 tape drive. A year ago we did a backup. We are now trying to restore data from this backup. The program allows us to select the correct backup and asks for the tape #12 (final tape) which it then reads. Then it acts for a non-existant tape #13. When it doesn't find it, it aborts the restore, without creating a catalog set for us to restore from. Dell said it sounded like the catalog on tape #12 was corrupted which is why it was asking for #13. They knew of no way around this to restore the data and suggested that we try Microsoft. Any advice would be appreciated as this is 18+ months of data!! My suggestion at this point would be to get hold of a copy of Veritas
Backup Exec (or -- with less enthusiasm -- Arcserve). Either of these can read msbackup tapes and I'm pretty sure Veritas at least is able to rebuild a catalog by reading the tape contents, though I've never tried it with an msbackup. Veritas may have a 30-day demo you can download - I'm not sure. A <gulp> data recovery service is the next step. After that, looking for another job tends to attain a certain allure. Now for the cold, hard truth-telling time. This wasn't part of your question I know, but that's the problem with free advice :-) If you're doing a 12 sequential non-raid tape backup with msbackup, you have a problem. For the same reason that a 12-disk raid0 stripe set would be a problem; one failure and >poof<. And if you're not verifying and checking your backups you have a problem. Your problem is that your company is not taking server backup seriously enough. And now you stumbled into the awful reality as to why you have to take it so seriously. Most of us get that lesson at one point or another, so I feel your pain. After you get past this mess, the first thing you need is a DLT 320, LTO or other high-capacity enterprise tape solution that can handle the data footprint you have. You may want to consider adding differentials and incrementals to the mix to reduce the overall backup load. Then - as overpriced as they tend to be - you absolutely need "real" backup software and there are a half-dozen or so reasonable ones out there to choose from. I would also recommend a weekly "safety backup" to a network share or NAS box on another machine. And of course you need rotating offsites. You need a disaster rebuild contingency in case you have to build up your server/domain from a fresh or flattened state (imaging software can be helpful here, or you can use an option on the backup software.) You need to verify your backups and you need to check them occasionally by trying to restore something from them. You need to periodically review your selection and exclusion lists to make sure new stuff is getting captured. Check the logs. All the usual scut-work sorts of things that nobody wants to bother with as long as things are working. Backup is the one true and ultimate redemption for all cybersins, mortal and venial. It doesn't matter what it costs, it can get you in to heaven when you need it. Spend it. Steve Duff, MCSE, MVP Ergodic Systems, Inc. Show quoteHide quote "debbiealp" <debbie***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:BB348886-B2E1-40AF-9CBF-19E115086B1A@microsoft.com... > We're using the Windows 2000 backup software Version 5.0 on a Dell 530 > desktop to backup data to a Dell Powervault 110T DELT VS 80 tape drive. A > year ago we did a backup. We are now trying to restore data from this > backup. The program allows us to select the correct backup and asks for the > tape #12 (final tape) which it then reads. Then it acts for a non-existant > tape #13. When it doesn't find it, it aborts the restore, without creating a > catalog set for us to restore from. Dell said it sounded like the catalog on > tape #12 was corrupted which is why it was asking for #13. They knew of no > way around this to restore the data and suggested that we try Microsoft. Any > advice would be appreciated as this is 18+ months of data!! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||