Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

External HDD Enclosure using USB question.

Author
30 Mar 2005 2:21 PM
MS
Hi,

I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the Manhattan
USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.

1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE connection? Is
the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the hard
disk's speed?

2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.

3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB port in
my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as normal (the
printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to open
the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC and
installing things is a major mission)?

Many thanks,

MS

Author
30 Mar 2005 6:12 PM
DL
Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
3) A USB hub will be fine
2) Everest
1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
manipulation may be too slow.

Show quoteHide quote
"MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the Manhattan
> USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>
> 1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
> achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE connection? Is
> the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the hard
> disk's speed?
>
> 2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
> 'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
>
> 3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
> I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB port in
> my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
> reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as normal (the
> printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to open
> the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC and
> installing things is a major mission)?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> MS
Author
30 Mar 2005 10:25 PM
MS
Many, many thanks DL.

Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than MSInfo32
which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it has already
graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just once --that's not
bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked in my 'Great Free
Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest says the USB controller is
version 1, no mention of version 2, so I will have to also buy a USB 2
card and install it. Oh well.

Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are approx.
60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video files but to be
used as a repository and not for editing or such like.

Cheers,

MS

PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':

"Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to my
recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry about the
multi-post."


DL emailed this:
Show quoteHide quote
> Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
> http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
> 3) A USB hub will be fine
> 2) Everest
> 1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
> Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
> using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
> manipulation may be too slow.
>
> "MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
> news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the Manhattan
>>USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>>
>>1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
>>achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE connection? Is
>>the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the hard
>>disk's speed?
>>
>>2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
>>'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
>>
>>3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
>>I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB port in
>>my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
>>reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as normal (the
>>printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to open
>>the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC and
>>installing things is a major mission)?
>>
>>Many thanks,
>>
>>MS
>
>
>
Author
31 Mar 2005 12:09 AM
DL
your welcome

Show quoteHide quote
"MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
news:6HF2e.464$G8.409@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Many, many thanks DL.
>
> Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than MSInfo32
> which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it has already
> graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just once --that's not
> bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked in my 'Great Free
> Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest says the USB controller is
> version 1, no mention of version 2, so I will have to also buy a USB 2
> card and install it. Oh well.
>
> Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are approx.
> 60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video files but to be
> used as a repository and not for editing or such like.
>
> Cheers,
>
> MS
>
> PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':
>
> "Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to my
> recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry about the
> multi-post."
>
>
> DL emailed this:
> > Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
> > http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
> > 3) A USB hub will be fine
> > 2) Everest
> > 1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
> > Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
> > using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
> > manipulation may be too slow.
> >
> > "MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
> > news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the
Manhattan
> >>USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
> >>
> >>1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
> >>achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE connection? Is
> >>the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the
hard
> >>disk's speed?
> >>
> >>2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
> >>'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
> >>
> >>3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
> >>I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB port
in
> >>my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
> >>reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as normal
(the
> >>printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to
open
> >>the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC and
> >>installing things is a major mission)?
> >>
> >>Many thanks,
> >>
> >>MS
> >
> >
> >
Author
31 Mar 2005 1:02 AM
Rob Stow
MS wrote:
> Many, many thanks DL.
>
> Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than MSInfo32
> which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it has already
> graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just once --that's not
> bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked in my 'Great Free
> Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest says the USB controller is
> version 1, no mention of version 2, so I will have to also buy a USB 2
> card and install it. Oh well.

Since you would need to buy a USB 2.0 card anyway, why not
consider other alternatives to USB for external drives ?

A USB controller really does bugger all - it relies on your CPU
to do most of the work.  Hence USB is very ill-suited for things
that need a lot of steady throughput - such as hard drives.

Both IEEE1394 (AKA "FireWire") and E-SATA (External SATA) will
give you better transfer rates and will not demand so much
attention from your CPU.   At the higher end, there is also SCSI.

Your motherboard might very well have one or two IEEE1394 ports.
  If it doesn't, then many USB PCI cards have one or two IEEE1394
ports on them anyway.


For E-SATA, I have one of these:
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=11930&vpn=RM1110-R1511&manufacture=Highpoint%20Technologies

It includes a PCI card with an E-SATA port, an external drive
enclosure, and a cable. You just need to buy a hard drive to
stick inside the drive enclosure.   It is a huge step up from the
crappy performance you get from a drive plugged into a USB 2.0
port.  The down side is that buying one of those and a 300 GB
drive to stick in it costs about $70 (Canadian) more than a USB
2.0 drive the same size.

Show quoteHide quote
>
> Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are approx.
> 60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video files but to be
> used as a repository and not for editing or such like.
>
> Cheers,
>
> MS
>
> PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':
>
> "Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to my
> recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry about the
> multi-post."
>
>
> DL emailed this:
>
>>Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
>>http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
>>3) A USB hub will be fine
>>2) Everest
>>1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
>>Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
>>using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
>>manipulation may be too slow.
>>
>>"MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
>>news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the Manhattan
>>>USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>>>
>>>1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
>>>achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE connection? Is
>>>the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the hard
>>>disk's speed?
>>>
>>>2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
>>>'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
>>>
>>>3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
>>>I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB port in
>>>my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
>>>reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as normal (the
>>>printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to open
>>>the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC and
>>>installing things is a major mission)?
>>>
>>>Many thanks,
>>>
>>>MS
>>
>>
>>
Author
2 Apr 2005 3:18 PM
MS
Hi Rob,

Many thanks for your excellent suggestion and apologies for taking 2 days
to reply, I was out all day yesterday.

I have followed your idea and bought these items:

Highpoint Rocket 1511 Single Channel SATA Host Adapter
Highpoint Rocket Mate 1110 e.SATA HDD Enclosure
Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM 200GB FDB 8Mb SATA HDD

They arrived this morning and I now have it all installed and working
perfectly, including having formatted the new HDD.

It is a far superior option to using USB and without your help I would not
have even known about external SATA.

Thanks again,

MS

Rob Stow emailed this:
Show quoteHide quote
> MS wrote:
>
>> Many, many thanks DL.
>>
>> Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than
>> MSInfo32 which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it has
>> already graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just once
>> --that's not bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked in my
>> 'Great Free Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest says the
>> USB controller is version 1, no mention of version 2, so I will have
>> to also buy a USB 2 card and install it. Oh well.
>
>
> Since you would need to buy a USB 2.0 card anyway, why not consider
> other alternatives to USB for external drives ?
>
> A USB controller really does bugger all - it relies on your CPU to do
> most of the work.  Hence USB is very ill-suited for things that need a
> lot of steady throughput - such as hard drives.
>
> Both IEEE1394 (AKA "FireWire") and E-SATA (External SATA) will give you
> better transfer rates and will not demand so much attention from your
> CPU.   At the higher end, there is also SCSI.
>
> Your motherboard might very well have one or two IEEE1394 ports.  If it
> doesn't, then many USB PCI cards have one or two IEEE1394 ports on them
> anyway.
>
>
> For E-SATA, I have one of these:
> http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=11930&vpn=RM1110-R1511&manufacture=Highpoint%20Technologies
>
>
> It includes a PCI card with an E-SATA port, an external drive enclosure,
> and a cable. You just need to buy a hard drive to stick inside the drive
> enclosure.   It is a huge step up from the crappy performance you get
> from a drive plugged into a USB 2.0 port.  The down side is that buying
> one of those and a 300 GB drive to stick in it costs about $70
> (Canadian) more than a USB 2.0 drive the same size.
>
>>
>> Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are approx.
>> 60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video files but to
>> be used as a repository and not for editing or such like.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> MS
>>
>> PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':
>>
>> "Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to my
>> recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry about
>> the multi-post."
>>
>>
>> DL emailed this:
>>
>>> Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
>>> http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
>>> 3) A USB hub will be fine
>>> 2) Everest
>>> 1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
>>> Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
>>> using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
>>> manipulation may be too slow.
>>>
>>> "MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
>>> news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the
>>>> Manhattan
>>>> USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
>>>> achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE
>>>> connection? Is
>>>> the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the
>>>> hard
>>>> disk's speed?
>>>>
>>>> 2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
>>>> 'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
>>>>
>>>> 3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
>>>> I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB
>>>> port in
>>>> my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
>>>> reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as
>>>> normal (the
>>>> printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to
>>>> open
>>>> the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC
>>>> and
>>>> installing things is a major mission)?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> MS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Author
2 Apr 2005 4:43 PM
Rob Stow
MS wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> Hi Rob,
>
> Many thanks for your excellent suggestion and apologies for taking 2 days
> to reply, I was out all day yesterday.
>
> I have followed your idea and bought these items:
>
> Highpoint Rocket 1511 Single Channel SATA Host Adapter
> Highpoint Rocket Mate 1110 e.SATA HDD Enclosure
> Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM 200GB FDB 8Mb SATA HDD
>
> They arrived this morning and I now have it all installed and working
> perfectly, including having formatted the new HDD.
>
> It is a far superior option to using USB and without your help I would not
> have even known about external SATA.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> MS
>

Glad I could help.

It hurts to see people using USB hard drives when a far better
solution exists if they can afford to spend just a little bit more.


Show quoteHide quote
> Rob Stow emailed this:
>
>>MS wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Many, many thanks DL.
>>>
>>>Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than
>>>MSInfo32 which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it has
>>>already graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just once
>>>--that's not bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked in my
>>>'Great Free Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest says the
>>>USB controller is version 1, no mention of version 2, so I will have
>>>to also buy a USB 2 card and install it. Oh well.
>>
>>
>>Since you would need to buy a USB 2.0 card anyway, why not consider
>>other alternatives to USB for external drives ?
>>
>>A USB controller really does bugger all - it relies on your CPU to do
>>most of the work.  Hence USB is very ill-suited for things that need a
>>lot of steady throughput - such as hard drives.
>>
>>Both IEEE1394 (AKA "FireWire") and E-SATA (External SATA) will give you
>>better transfer rates and will not demand so much attention from your
>>CPU.   At the higher end, there is also SCSI.
>>
>>Your motherboard might very well have one or two IEEE1394 ports.  If it
>>doesn't, then many USB PCI cards have one or two IEEE1394 ports on them
>>anyway.
>>
>>
>>For E-SATA, I have one of these:
>>http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=11930&vpn=RM1110-R1511&manufacture=Highpoint%20Technologies
>>
>>
>>It includes a PCI card with an E-SATA port, an external drive enclosure,
>>and a cable. You just need to buy a hard drive to stick inside the drive
>>enclosure.   It is a huge step up from the crappy performance you get
>>from a drive plugged into a USB 2.0 port.  The down side is that buying
>>one of those and a 300 GB drive to stick in it costs about $70
>>(Canadian) more than a USB 2.0 drive the same size.
>>
>>
>>>Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are approx.
>>>60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video files but to
>>>be used as a repository and not for editing or such like.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>MS
>>>
>>>PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':
>>>
>>>"Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to my
>>>recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry about
>>>the multi-post."
>>>
>>>
>>>DL emailed this:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
>>>>http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
>>>>3) A USB hub will be fine
>>>>2) Everest
>>>>1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
>>>>Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what your
>>>>using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
>>>>manipulation may be too slow.
>>>>
>>>>"MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the
>>>>>Manhattan
>>>>>USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>>>>>
>>>>>1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
>>>>>achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE
>>>>>connection? Is
>>>>>the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than the
>>>>>hard
>>>>>disk's speed?
>>>>>
>>>>>2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
>>>>>'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or not.
>>>>>
>>>>>3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2 printers.
>>>>>I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB
>>>>>port in
>>>>>my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there any
>>>>>reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as
>>>>>normal (the
>>>>>printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having to
>>>>>open
>>>>>the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the PC
>>>>>and
>>>>>installing things is a major mission)?
>>>>>
>>>>>Many thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>MS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Author
4 Apr 2005 2:51 PM
MS
> Glad I could help.
>
> It hurts to see people using USB hard drives when a far better solution
> exists if they can afford to spend just a little bit more.

It wasn't that much more and well worth the extra cost, especially given I
didn't have a spare USB port and no USB 2 at all, and so would need to buy
and install a USB 2 card.

Thanks again,

MS

Rob Stow emailed this:
Show quoteHide quote
> MS wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Many thanks for your excellent suggestion and apologies for taking 2
>> days to reply, I was out all day yesterday.
>>
>> I have followed your idea and bought these items:
>>
>> Highpoint Rocket 1511 Single Channel SATA Host Adapter
>> Highpoint Rocket Mate 1110 e.SATA HDD Enclosure
>> Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM 200GB FDB 8Mb SATA HDD
>>
>> They arrived this morning and I now have it all installed and working
>> perfectly, including having formatted the new HDD.
>>
>> It is a far superior option to using USB and without your help I would
>> not have even known about external SATA.
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> MS
>>
>
>
>> Rob Stow emailed this:
>>
>>> MS wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Many, many thanks DL.
>>>>
>>>> Wow 'Everest' is one great bit of software, so much better than
>>>> MSInfo32 which is now redundant! In fact Everest looks so good it
>>>> has already graduated to a desktop icon even after running it just
>>>> once --that's not bad going on my machine (it is also now bookmarked
>>>> in my 'Great Free Software' folder). The bad news is that Everest
>>>> says the USB controller is version 1, no mention of version 2, so I
>>>> will have to also buy a USB 2 card and install it. Oh well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Since you would need to buy a USB 2.0 card anyway, why not consider
>>> other alternatives to USB for external drives ?
>>>
>>> A USB controller really does bugger all - it relies on your CPU to do
>>> most of the work.  Hence USB is very ill-suited for things that need
>>> a lot of steady throughput - such as hard drives.
>>>
>>> Both IEEE1394 (AKA "FireWire") and E-SATA (External SATA) will give
>>> you better transfer rates and will not demand so much attention from
>>> your CPU.   At the higher end, there is also SCSI.
>>>
>>> Your motherboard might very well have one or two IEEE1394 ports.  If
>>> it doesn't, then many USB PCI cards have one or two IEEE1394 ports on
>>> them anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>> For E-SATA, I have one of these:
>>> http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=11930&vpn=RM1110-R1511&manufacture=Highpoint%20Technologies
>>>
>>>
>>> It includes a PCI card with an E-SATA port, an external drive
>>> enclosure, and a cable. You just need to buy a hard drive to stick
>>> inside the drive enclosure.   It is a huge step up from the crappy
>>> performance you get from a drive plugged into a USB 2.0 port.  The
>>> down side is that buying one of those and a 300 GB drive to stick in
>>> it costs about $70 (Canadian) more than a USB 2.0 drive the same size.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks also for the USB NEC link, which informs me speeds are
>>>> approx. 60MB/s which will be fine for me. It is in fact for video
>>>> files but to be used as a repository and not for editing or such like.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> MS
>>>>
>>>> PS. This is the reply I made to you in 'hardware':
>>>>
>>>> "Thanks... and I forgot to add microsoft.public.win2000.hardware to
>>>> my recipient list before posting and so posted here as well. Sorry
>>>> about the multi-post."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DL emailed this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Everest Home will reveal a wealth of info
>>>>> http://www.lavalys.com/products.php?lang=en
>>>>> 3) A USB hub will be fine
>>>>> 2) Everest
>>>>> 1) http://www.necel.com/en/faq/f_usbspec.html one site that gives info
>>>>> Whether the actual data rate is important to you may depend on what
>>>>> your
>>>>> using the disk for. eg Office docs may be fine, but video/graphics
>>>>> manipulation may be too slow.
>>>>>
>>>>> "MS" <matth***@mailsnare.---nojunktakeout---.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hBy2e.6$G8.5@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking about getting an External HDD Enclosure such as the
>>>>>> Manhattan
>>>>>> USB 2.0 3.5" External HDD Enclosure and have a couple of questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Assuming they work well, what kind of data transfer rates do they
>>>>>> achieve over USB and is it a lot slower than a normal IDE
>>>>>> connection? Is
>>>>>> the speed bottleneck the speed of the USB connection rather than
>>>>>> the hard
>>>>>> disk's speed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) How can I tell if my USB ports are USB 2.0 or not? I've looked in
>>>>>> 'device manager' which doesn't seem to say whether it's v. 2.0 or
>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. I only have 2 USB ports and both are currently in use by 2
>>>>>> printers.
>>>>>> I've seen a 4 port USB hub, which has one end to connect to a USB
>>>>>> port in
>>>>>> my PC and the other end which provides 4 USB input ports. Is there
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> reason why I can't buy one of these and use all the devices as
>>>>>> normal (the
>>>>>> printers don't get much use) rather than buying a card and having
>>>>>> to open
>>>>>> the PC up and install it (I'm physically disabled and opening the
>>>>>> PC and
>>>>>> installing things is a major mission)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>